After the last cities I had visited in
the U.S., St. Louis, Dallas and Houston, coming to New Orleans was
certainly exciting, finally a city with a really lively downtown area
(Bourbon Street maybe too lively...), and together with perfect
weather, it has been fun to explore the city and its streetcar
system.
Without doubt, the streetcars
belong to New Orleans like the cable cars belong to San Francisco,
but they are not just another tourist attraction but an integral part
of the city's transport system, and as such I will treat them in this
analysis.
We'll have to distinguish between
the St. Charles Streetcar, the one with the green cars and the only
one that is authentic, and the other lines, those with the red cars,
which pretend to be old, but aren't.
The St. Charles Streetcar is a
listed monument and as such was chosen to be preserved the way it is.
That's also the reason it is not fully accessible, so if you can't
climb in, you can't ride it. So far so good! The first thing I never
understand with these old streetcar lines, why do they have to be
operated like a streetcar 130 years ago? Why can't they at least
raise the platforms to something like 15-20 cm so that the first step
up into the vehicle is easier? It wouldn't change the 'design' of the
stops. Why can't they put at least some sort of information at stops?
The only thing you find is a 'Car stop' sign, which is already a lot
compared to the surface sections of Muni Metro! But would a small
table with basic information like route number, destination and at
least headways be too much to ask for? As with the new lines, trains
are extremely irregular at times with more passengers like this past
weekend because the boarding is absolutely inefficient, so a tram may
take 15 minutes or more just to leave Canal Street and turn around
into St. Charles Avenue. At least on the green vehicles, the fare box
is located in a more logical place (easier to place as all stops have
boarding from the right side), but too many people pay cash and so
they have to funnel their knitted dollar notes into the slot, plus a
quarter for a single ride, or they buy a day pass for three dollars,
funnelling three banknotes into the slot, plus those who do not know
what they want, so boarding takes ages. And as a result, the headways
can't be kept, i.e. you can be sure that if no tram arrives for a
long time, two or three less crowded ones will follow soon after. But
drivers were not really too energetic about asking people to wait for
the next vehicle. Luckily there are quite a few crossovers along the
line, so cars can turn back at several points, I observed that at
Broadway just after Audubon Park as not so many people go to the end
of the line. Amazing though, that this line runs all night!
Theoretically every 30 minutes, but it is nowhere written when that
is. I would think that if headways are longer than 15 minutes, the
proper times must be posted at all stops. In all cars there are signs
that exit is through the rear doors, but noone cares, and on the St.
Charles Streetcar I wouldn't care either because to get out the rear
door you have to push the door open, and honestly, I did it once, but
hardly managed being a 185 cm tall man! And if you have a bag or two
with you, it would be impossible! Another problem along this line is
the excessive number of stops, namely 54 on a 10.6 km line, no wonder
it takes at least 45 minutes to ride the entire line. Wouldn't it
help everybody if some were simply cancelled? I'm sure the heritage
office would not object to improvements in all these fields. They
didn't object the modern fare boxes either and demand a conductor
selling tickets as would have been the case a 100 years ago, I
assume.
All the other lines were actually
newly built in the last 30 years. But they are operated like a
streetcar in the 1890s, it is really a pity because there must be a
better way to combine a classical look of a streetcar with a modern
operation.
The oldest of the new lines is the Riverfront line, which
is actually the fastest line but operated far below its potential
simply because you never know when it comes along and because
headways are far too long. It runs close to the popular areas in the
French Quarter and the French Market, but it is hidden behind a (what
I learned today) now unused floodwall, so unlike Canal Street where
you can see from a distance if a tram is approaching, on the
Riverfront you have to actually go to the stop, but there is no clear
information, although there are screens but hardly legible, they even
show the position of the trams. I have actually read that this line
has 7 vehicles, but why are they not running, or at least 6? I think
I only saw 2 or 3 at one time. To be really attractive there should
be a tram at least every 10 minutes! Six cars would be an acceptable
service on this short line. Absurdly, at the terminus French Quarter,
the screen says, 'car #20xx is approaching' when it is actually in
the station, and who cares when it is approaching when all that
matters is when it is departing, an information strictly omitted. I
wonder who these incomptent people are who design such an
(dis)information system? And there should be more trams going from
French Market directly to Canal Street, like on weekends, but far
more frequently! Now many passengers have to change at Canal Street,
cross several streets and then at the end of the Canal Street lines
it is completely unclear where they have to board the next tram! When
I went down the southern leg of the Riverfront line, drivers made
everybody alight at Julia Street, although they went further down to
reverse, but I guess the last stop is only served when the Convention
Center is open.
The Canal Street line has a
perfect tramway alignment in the median of the wide road, so it is
even more a pity it is operated like an old-fashioned streetcar
instead of a modern tramway. This line is heavily used by locals who
would actually deserve something better. Even good-old Blackpool
realised that proper vehicles are needed to provide a proper service,
and the red replica cars are certainly no state-of-the-art vehicles.
To be ADA-compliant, they have two wheelchair lifts! I only saw them
in service once. But everybody else has to climb the steep steps just
like on the old original green cars. Again, I observed mothers with
their kids on their arms and with bags and trolleys heaving
themselves up into the car, digging out their wallet to pay the fare.
And paying the fare on the red vehicles is even weirder, as the
farebox is placed in the middle and turned around. The drivers always
turn round, and noone understands how to put the money in, so they
have to do it for them, so with lots of tourists boarding at the
lower end of the line, a trip from Harrah's to Rampart may easily
take 15 minutes for not even 1 km! Once the trams get passed the
junction where the Loyola Streetcar turns off, the ride gets a bit
speedier because not so many people get on. The last stop on this
line is Cemeteries, but when you leave the single-stub terminus there
is no legal way to cross the busy street to reach the main cemetery.
Whereas the main line to the Cemeteries is frequently served
(officially every 16 minutes), the branch to City Park only has a
tram every 30 minutes, although it is a very popular destination on
weekends, and also a very nice park! So my proposal would be to order
proper modern tram vehicles for this line, with much higher capacity
and, above all, better accessibility to speed up boarding, install
more ticket vending machines (I think I only saw one somewhere
downtown). Like on the Pöstlingbergbahn in Linz, Austria, where
similar heritage issues had to be solved, these modern cars can have
a retro look, and they could be mixed with the existing replica cars
that could continue to serve the City Park branch. Of course, also on
Canal Street, at least 10 stops should be eliminated. The remaining
stops should at least have low platforms, instead of complete
street-level boarding. At least, the stops are easier to spot, as
they have shelters and a busstop-like sign with the route number and
route name and colour. Some shelters had maps posted, but also here
the standard of the information provided could be improved with basic
timetable information and fares, etc. Streetcar leaflets were
available in some vehicles. On the red cars, doors at the rear open
automatically, so getting off is a bit easier than on the green cars.
They also feature air-conditioning.
The newest addition to the
streetcar system was the Loyola Streetcar, a short branch to the
Amtrak and Greyhound station. Although it was not built on a reserved
lane, it is quite fluid on Loyola Avenue, less so on Canal Street.
But again, its 20-minute headway is too long, considering that you
can get to most destinations it serves within 20 minutes walking,
especially as again there are no timetables posted, so you never know
how long you would have to wait or whether it would be better to walk
straight away. There is no reason at all, why this line has to be
operated with old replica cars, because ideally it would be used by
passengers arriving with luggage on trains or buses, and to lift
those into these cars may be a major challenge, too.
It is completely incomprehensible
to me that some transit operators still don't understand that good
headways and complete information about them are basic to attract
riders and provide a good service. And I do not accept fancy websites
or mobile trip planners, but I want in situ information, properly
posted and electronic for real-time updates.
I have not seen much work yet on
the future North Rampart route, but hopefully it is coming soon, plus
the link along Esplanade to link up with the Riverfront line. A
circle line around the French Quarter operated with vintage vehicles,
plus the old St. Charles Streetcar should actually be enough to keep
tourists happy, so the rest of lines could instead become modern
streetcar lines. But by modern, I do not mean the sort of tiny
streetcars operated in Portland or Seattle, but at least some kind of
articulated tram like that starting soon in Atlanta or Cincinnati.
Fares in New Orleans are at the cheap
end, with $1.25 for a single ride (+ $0.50 for a transfer), and a day
pass for the entire RTA system is just $3.00! I bought a 3-day pass
at Walgreens for $9.00, so it actually doesn't give a discount, and
in the end I didn't fully use it on the last two days, but never
mind. I think the farebox was prepared with smartcard readers, but I
didn't see anyone pay with one.
Next stop: ATLANTA
LINKS
RTA (New Orleans Regional Transit Authority)
New Orleans at UrbanRail.Net
Resulting from this U.S. trip, I have now published the third book in my U.S. series, namely "Subways & Light Rail in the U.S.A. - Vol. 3: Midwest & South", for more info see
ReplyDeletehttp://www.robert-schwandl.de/usa/midwest-south/