The second stop on my US tour this year
was Salt Lake City, which I reached just before midnight after a more
than 15-hour train ride on the California Zephyr from Denver (great
scenery, low speed...). I had the next two days (13-14 July 2012) to
explore the city and its light rail and commuter rail system.
In many aspects, the light rail system
is similar to that in Denver, and having come from there, it seems
quite natural to make a few comparisons. The system is called TRAX, a
name which seems to be used also in everyday speech.
Light Rail routes
Like in Denver, the downtown sections
of the system are on reserved lanes (protected by curbs) along urban
streets, notable Main Street, the city's main artery, and South
Temple, the major east-west route. The intersection of both next to
the Mormon Temple marks the point where streets are devided into
North, East, South and West.
The original route ran from what is now
Arena station (initially Delta Center) to Sandy in the south. There
is a short on-street sections, though with low car traffic, between
900 South and Ballpark stations, south of that there is a
railway-type right-of-way along an old railway route. On this
section, trains speed up considerably, probably the fastest light
rail ride I have seen, and unlike Denver, automatically closing
barriers seem to be enough as there is no horn blowing or bells.
Trains even enter stations quite fast without any warning sound. On
these sections, there are several level crossings, but trains cause
barriers to close automatically and so there are no delays.
The downtown route was later extended
to Salt Lake Central, a transportation hub with a bus terminal and
the Frontrunner commuter rail.
In time for the 2002 Winter Olympics,
the eastern branch to the Stadium and later to the University was
completed. This route is somehow different and appears to be more of
a modern tram line: the tracks do not run straight along the median
of the road like on the other downtown sections, instead they
continuously adjust to the number of required road lanes, and at
several of the numerous intersections, the LRT has to share the lane
with left-turning traffic, resulting in a severe reduction of travel
speed as the trains cannot keep up with the parallel road traffic,
instead they are often held too long at those intersections.
The two newest routes, to the Jordan
Valley and West Valley partly follow old railway routes, and are
generally built on generous alignments with wide curves. There are
three major bridge structures on the Green Line to West Valley, over
the mainline railway tracks, the Jordan River and over the I-215
motorway. There is a lot of development along this route, but the Red
Line to Daybreak runs, and will run for many years still, through
completely undeveloped areas, especially the two stops before the
terminus are in the middle of nowhere, with just small car parks next
to them. Even a station named West Jordan City Center is quite
misleading: although there are a few new administrative buildings
nearby, it does not appear to be anything one might associate with a
city center. Another misleading name is the junction called Central
Pointe! Nothing much but some industrial yards there! So these two
extensions were built futureproof and it will be seen whether
development along the lines becomes a reality soon. But I wonder if
they were really the highest priority or simply easy to implement.
The airport branch is almost complete,
with overhead wires in place on the stretches I saw. This will open
in 2013 and provide a good connection to all downtown hotels. They
are also building a direct interchange for the Green Line and the
FrontRunner at North Temple, where the old road bridge was replaced
by a new structure. So the Green Line will then no longer go to Salt
Lake Central, but to the Airport.
Like in Denver, it is interesting that
all lines share the same route on a section south of the city centre,
on a stretch where you would not really need multiple lines.
Unfortunately, the Red Line does not actually enter the downtown area
proper, instead its closest downtown stop is Courthouse, at the
southern edge of the downtown area. So many people change there to
get to City Center station, which in fact deserves that name. The new
City Creek shopping mall opened there recently, and all the tourist
sites around Temple Square are accessible from there.
At the termini, there is an
announcement saying “This is the end of the line, as far as we
go!”, and (I don't know if this is common across the USA) they
pronounce a station name written as “900 South” as “9th
South” (and the station sign actually says 860 South 200 West!). By
the way, a SLC speciality is that (approximate) street numbers are
added to the station names, especially on the original line to Sandy.
These are also announced, for example, on the Green Line to West
Valley, although they are not shown on maps. For people who have the
numbering system of the city streets present in their minds, this
will certainly be helpful, while I personally get confused by these
numbers.
Light Rail stations
Like in Denver, all stations are in a
very good shape, although built to a rather standard design (on the
southern branches, the stations roofs take the colour of the line
serving the respective branch!). All stations have shelters, mostly
one at either end of the platform as trains always stop at the front
end of each side. On the Blue Line as well as on the University
branch of the Red Line, stations have short elevated platforms like
in Denver to allow level boarding on older trains; the new branches,
however, have no such platforms and can therefore only be served by
the newer S70 cars (see below). Most stations are enhanced with
public art, generally located in the middle of the platform, and with
window paintings or illustrations at the covered wind/rain shelters.
Generally, stations have island platforms accessible at-grade from
adjacent streets. At the few stations with side platforms, the
exiting side is announced on the train. There are no metro-style
stations, where passengers wouldn't have to cross the tracks. The
platforms are some 20 cm high, so a low step remains to enter
low-floor trains too, which have an automatically extracting ramp for
wheelchair users. All stations have ticket vending machines and
modern next-train indicators showing the minutes remaining for the
next three trains, normally.
Especially on the Blue Line to Sandy,
but also the two new southern branches, the immediate areas around
the stations look little attractive and do not invite to get off the
train to explore further (which doesn't mean that there isn't
anything to explore). Many stations provide bus connections and
several have car parks but never as big as in other cities.
Compared to Denver there is slightly
more transit police visible, but mostly at busier stations like
Courthouse to supervise the sometimes crowded platform.
Light Rail rolling stock
UTA has three different types of
trains, but only two seem to be in regular service now. I saw several
of the ex San Jose Bombardier built trains in the depot, but not in
service on any line, maybe they are kept in reserve. The older type
in service, and now only on the Blue Line due to the required
mini-high platforms for level access, are the Siemens SD 160
basically identical to those in Denver and other American cities.
They featured bus-like seating, i.e. in each section of an
articulated unit, all seats look towards the driver's cabin, no
face-to-face seating! Unlike Denver, however, SLC switches to
Siemens' S70 model, also in use in San Diego, for the expansion of
the fleet. These are 70% low-floor, with all four doors on each side
allowing level access for everyone. One door on each side has a
special wheelchair button which activates a ramp to bridge the small
gap and difference in height. This works relatively fast compared to
the manual procedure on the older trains. The end sections of these
trains are raised, with seats above the proper bogies. If you sit on
the right side, you can look out the front window through the
driver's cabin to watch the route. The short middle section rests on
a set of wheels, which unfortunately makes a lot of noise, even on
good new track. So although the low-level technology is, of course,
the better option, the overall ride is better and smoother on the
older trains (but this is something true for almost any low-floor
vehicle).
Independent of the type of car used,
they usually work in 2-car formations, which are extended to 3 cars
during peak hours. They are all equipped with visual and acoustic
station and destination announcements. Trains have air-conditioning,
and unlike in Denver, passengers open doors individually.
FrontRunner Commuter Rail
For several years now, SLC has probably
operated the most frequent commuter rail service west of Chicago. The
FrontRunner, which so far runs only north from SLC to Ogden, has a
train every 30 minutes throughout the day, so I would rather call it
Suburban Rail or Regional Rail. On Saturdays, trains run hourly, but
there are no trains on Sundays. FrontRunner has its own tracks,
partly single-track with passing loops (most stations have two
tracks, too), so they do not share tracks with freight traffic. The
stations are similar to light rail stations, but maybe with a more
individual design. With low platforms, there is level entry onto the
lower level of these trains.
The trains in service are Bombardier
double-deck carriages with a very European interior, and after a few
years in service they still look quite good. The ride is very smooth
and fast. They are pulled or pushed by diesel locomotives. The
north-south line is now being extended all the way south to Provo. I
don't know if UTA purchased more of the same trains for this
extension or whether they will use the rather old carriages bought
from New Jersey Transit, which they refurbished a bit. Some of these
were stored wrapped in plastic along the northern line. Transfer to
the light rail at Salt Lake Central is made easy with a short walk
across the pedestrianised square.
Fare System
UTA, Salt Lake City's transit agency,
offers a quite simple fare structure. Any station on the light rail
system can be reached with a standard fare of 2.35 USD, and a day
pass for light rail and buses is available for just 5.75 USD. Unlike
in Denver, these day passes can be bought from ticket vending
machines, too, which are easy and simple to handle. The downtown area
is basically a free-fare zone, so you can hop on and off the train
without requiring a ticket.
Special though very low fares are
required for the FrontRunner, and if you have a day pass, this
reduces the add-on fare even more.
I didn't get a chance to look at the
bus system properly. Bus stops seems to have some basic information
like which line passes and where it goes but no timetable. I don't
know if bus maps are available as I didn't find an information
office. The one I had the address of, around the corner from City
Center station, had a sign 'UTA has moved' without saying where to.
Yes, “TRAX” is used as shorthand for the light rail system, similar to how “BART” is used in the Bay Area: as in, “I’m taking TRAX.” This branding is smart, as it gives transit greater familiarity and identity. In Denver, one can only say “I’m taking light rail” - at this point, no single line there has enough notoriety such that one can say “I’m taking the ‘H Line’” and everyone would know what one is talking about.
ReplyDeleteThe newest routes to Daybreak and West Valley City are interesting for a number of reasons. The embankment supporting the trackbed between the Jordan River and mainline railway track bridges was basically built out of styrofoam - rather than using traditional compacted earth, which would have taken longer to settle, an artificial foundation layer was used to speed construction.
It certainly is true that the new lines run through undeveloped areas. Along the Green Line, horse properties are adjacent to the tracks, and along the Red Line, antelope can be spotted from the train! However, this will not always be the case - Daybreak is designed as a large-scale, greenfield transit-oriented development and the extension was only built there because the municipality - the City of South Jordan - worked with developers to plan (relatively) dense development around the new stations.
Yes, suburban America is in a constant identity crisis - outlying municipalities strive to assert themselves as legitimate cities, and one of the primary means of doing so is through names. So the station next to the municipal offices of the City of West Jordan is given the name “West Jordan City Center” - perhaps a lofty title, but if this city has a “center”, it’s right where the station is. Less logical, of course, is Central Pointe Station. It is located at the boundary between Salt Lake City and its immediate southern neighbor - the City of South Salt Lake - and thus its location isn’t central to either. It took its name from the adjacent development property - basically a big box store and a fast food restaurant - which has actually since changed its name to “Inter Pointe”! The generic “Central Pointe” is still preferable to “2100 South” - the name it would otherwise have, and it will assume a very “central” position in the transit network when the Sugar House Streetcar connects there in a few years (http://www.rideuta.com/mc/?page=Projects-SugarHouseStreetCar).
The recorded announcements have a kind of homespun quality (the voice is a drawly female monotone and doesn’t sound much like a professional voice actress), and the “end of the line, as far as we go!” bit is especially cheesy. Utahns are obsessed with their street numbering system, as is evident with the practice of putting the exact street address as prominently as the station name on the signage, as well as on the maps (why? is anyone sending mail to the station? why don’t we put the ZIP code, too?) In fact, three of the stations (all on the new Red Line extension) must be the only urban rail stations anywhere that are named as addresses: “2700 W. Sugar Factory Rd.”, “4773 W. Old Bingham Hwy.”, and “5651 W. Old Bingham Hwy.” I don’t understand why simpler names consistent with the rest of the system weren’t chosen, even simply “4800 West” and “5600 West” (the cross streets) would have been better than an exact address. In any case, one hopes that once the area around 5651 W. Old Bingham Hwy. Station is developed (the site is currently surrounded by open fields), the name might be changed to reflect that of the new neighborhood or one of its streets.
ReplyDeleteVisitors with a sharp eye might notice that the TRAX stations bear a striking resemblance to the ones along the original Portland MAX line. When TRAX was first being planned, the City of Sandy was very much opposed and even threatened to block construction of the southern end of the (now) Blue Line, which may very well have terminated in neighboring Midvale instead. So, in an effort to show them that light rail wasn’t the evil they imagined, UTA sponsored a trip for Sandy officials to Portland, and they agreed to permit construction if the stations looked like Portland’s. UTA got the plans and copied the design (which was by that time fifteen years old), and rather than spend money on different station designs, Sandy’s preference was then implemented along the entire line, and now throughout the system.
The design isn’t awful, but it has a generic neo-historicist look that is uninspiring, but fits into the suburban landscape I suppose. I don’t know why Americans always have to think “choo-choo train” and come up with cutesy station designs that try to look as if they are old steam train depots. Why not something contemporary, like the trains themselves? The two new Daybreak stations at the end of the Red Line are a breath of fresh air - they are the only side-platform stations, and since the copycat Portland canopy wouldn’t work in a narrower footprint, a striking new design was commissioned that wouldn’t look out of place in, say, Hannover - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Red_line_Trax_at_Daybreak_Parkway_and_platforms.jpg
UTA does print a system map - http://www.rideuta.com/uploads/SaltLakeSystemMap_April2012.pdf - which would have been available at the staffed office that was closed to make way for the new City Creek development downtown (last year at this time it was open and had schedules for every bus route). The new station at the airport will be an extension of one of the terminal buildings and have an indoor area with a UTA “Welcome Center” (http://www.letsrideuta.com/2010/11/04/see-future-airport-trax-stations-today/), where one expects all printed information materials will be available.
"I don’t know why Americans always have to think “choo-choo train” and come up with cutesy station designs that try to look as if they are old steam train depots."
ReplyDeletePerhaps because choo-choo trains were historically taken by the middle and upper classes, while urban transit in the US mainly serves the lower class?
No although for some Americans who haven't rode trains or rail transit - all vehicles on rails are trains. Most folks that regularly ride trains and rail transit know the difference. As in many countries all income levels ride both trains and transit. As for cutesy streetlamps - this is just another iteration of earlier streetlamps replaced by aluminum lamp posts with much stronger lighting, which while emitting more light, were esthetically poorly conceived. So again we have in SF "Path of Gold" streetlights. This time properly anchored.
ReplyDeleteAs or Salt Lake commuter rail and light rail. Its a good way to get around. Like Dallas and initially Denver- Rail mass transit was initially a hard sell in very conservative areas and of course folks who never knew commuter rail or streetcars or rapid transit. It does prove that if you build it and there is some sort of viable economy- they will come.
ReplyDeleteYou bear through a awesome vacancy. I sanity definitely quarry it moreover personally suggest to my buddys. I am self-possessed they determination be benefited from this scene. Horseshoe Bay Waterfront Real Estate
ReplyDeleteAwesome Post
ReplyDeleteVisit Me
Aluminum railing Surrey